Thank you for your response. I'm happy to hear this. I will try to test it as soon as I can and reply here.
Posts made by joe
-
RE: different modules simultaneously on jetson nano mipi interface
-
different modules simultaneously on jetson nano mipi interface
Dear V-EYE support,
I would like to know if it is possible to connect and use two different camera modules simultaneously with a Jetson Nano via the MIPI interface. Specifically, I am interested in using the IMX462, AR234, or IMX265 modules.
Best regards,
-
IMX462 and Jetson Nano problem
Hello,
I'm trying to use the IMX462 v-eye camera with a Jetson Nano. My Jetpack version is 4.6. I followed the instructions on this link:
https://wiki.veye.cc/index.php/VEYE_CS_Camera_for_Jetson_TX2After copying the "tegra210-p3448-0000-p3449-0000-b00.dtb" file to "/boot/veyecam" and making changes to the "/boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf" file, I restarted the board. However, I encountered the following error:
dmesg | grep veye [ 2.436857] veyecam 7-003b: probing v4l2 sensor [ 2.437085] veyecam 7-003b: tegracam sensor driver: veyecam_v2.0.6 [ 3.544132] veyecam 7-003b: probe failed [ 3.548192] veyecam 7-003b: board setup failed [ 3.552794] veyecam 8-003b: probing v4l2 sensor [ 3.553005] veyecam 8-003b: tegracam sensor driver: veyecam_v2.0.6 [ 3.563049] veyecam 8-003b: probe failed [ 3.567120] veyecam 8-003b: board setup failed
What should I check next?
Thank you for your support.
Best regards,
Joe -
RE: VEYE-imx462 and Orin Nano developer kit problem
@joe
It is indicated in the documents about "New function list" that:
"The following new features are only supported in camera's firmware versions with release time later than 2022-11-22."
My firmware version is exactly 2022-11-22. Is this version support "New function list"? -
RE: VEYE-imx462 and Orin Nano developer kit problem
@veye_xumm
It work, after change the mipi connector! (I use -b 9.)
Thanks -
RE: VEYE-imx462 and Orin Nano developer kit problem
@veye_xumm
I noticed that there is no difference when I change the order of '-b 10' to the end of the line in the command. I'm running the command from ~/nvidia_jetson_veye_bsp/i2c_cmd/bin; can you confirm if this path is correct? Additionally, I'm open to any alternative solutions or suggestions. Thanks in advance for your help! -
RE: VEYE-imx462 and Orin Nano developer kit problem
@veye_xumm
It seems that the parameters I've configured are retaining their previous values:./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -b 10 -r -f mshutter
r mshutter is 0x 0
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -b 10 -w -f mshutter -p1 0x44
w mshutter is 0x44
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -b 10 -r -f mshutter
r mshutter is 0x 0or
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -b 10 -r -f mirrormode
r mirrormode is 0x 0
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -b 10 -w -f mirrormode -p1 0x02
w mirrormode is 0x 2
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -b 10 -r -f mirrormode
r mirrormode is 0x 0Am I making a mistake somewhere?
-
RE: VEYE-imx462 and Orin Nano developer kit problem
The results:
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -r -f hdver -b 9
hardware version is 0x 1
release date is 20 1- 1- 1./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -r -f hdver -b 10
hardware version is 0x 7
release date is 20 0- 0- 0 -
RE: VEYE-imx462 and Orin Nano developer kit problem
@veye_xumm
Thank you for your online response.
What about my second question. Have I do something wrong that the values of parameters do not set?
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -b 9 -r -f mshutter
r mshutter is 0x 1
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -b 9 -w -f mshutter -p1 0x44
w mshutter is 0x44
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -b 9 -r -f mshutter
r mshutter is 0x 1
It have the fix value every time i get it!Thank you for your ongoing support
-
RE: VEYE-imx462 and Orin Nano developer kit problem
@veye_xumm
Thank you for your prompt response.
I'm currently facing two issues while using the I2C script to set parameters from the specified path: nvidia_jetson_veye_bsp/i2c_cmd/bin/veye_mipi_i2c.sh .1- Firstly, the document link provided (https://wiki.veye.cc/index.php/I2c_bus_number_and_video_node) does not specify the appropriate -b parameter for Orin Nano. To identify the correct bus number, I executed the following command:
ls -ltrh /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-2 -> ../../../devices/platform/3180000.i2c/i2c-2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-9 -> ../../../devices/platform/3180000.i2c/i2c-2/i2c-9
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-8 -> ../../../devices/platform/31e0000.i2c/i2c-8
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-7 -> ../../../devices/platform/c250000.i2c/i2c-7
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-6 -> ../../../devices/platform/31c0000.i2c/i2c-6
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-5 -> ../../../devices/platform/31b0000.i2c/i2c-5
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-4 -> ../../../devices/platform/bpmp/bpmp:i2c/i2c-4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-3 -> ../../../devices/platform/3190000.i2c/i2c-3
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-10 -> ../../../devices/platform/3180000.i2c/i2c-2/i2c-10
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-1 -> ../../../devices/platform/c240000.i2c/i2c-1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 15 2023 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0 -> ../../../devices/platform/3160000.i2c/i2c-0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 19 05:26 /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-11 -> ../../../devices/platform/13800000.display/i2c-11
Can you assist me in determining the appropriate -b parameter based on this information?2- Secondly, although I can successfully read parameters, I encounter difficulties when attempting to set them. For instance:
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -r -f mshutter
r mshutter is 0x1
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -w -f mshutter -p1 0x44
w mshutter is 0x44
./veye_mipi_i2c.sh -r -f mshutter
r mshutter is 0x1
It appears that the parameter is not being set successfully, as reading it after the supposed update returns the default value. Could you guide me on where I might be going wrong in the parameter-setting process?
I appreciate your assistance in advance. -
RE: VEYE-imx462 and Orin Nano developer kit problem
I appreciate your prompt and helpful response. I successfully copied the dtbs file from "dtbs/Orin/JetPack_5.1.2_Linux_JETSON_ORIN_TARGETS/dts dtb/VEYE-MIPI-CAM2M" path, and everything is functioning properly.
However, I am currently facing a second issue related to camera controls. I am attempting to manage exposure and gain, but when I use the v4l2-ctl command to list the camera controls, I cannot locate the settings for exposure and gain. Is there an alternative method to control exposure and gain that you could recommend?
The v4l2-ctl --all result:Driver Info:
Driver name : tegra-video
Card type : vi-output, veyecam 10-003b
Bus info : platform:tegra-capture-vi:2
Driver version : 5.10.120
Capabilities : 0x84200001
Video Capture
Streaming
Extended Pix Format
Device Capabilities
Device Caps : 0x04200001
Video Capture
Streaming
Extended Pix Format
Media Driver Info:
Driver name : tegra-camrtc-ca
Model : NVIDIA Tegra Video Input Device
Serial :
Bus info :
Media version : 5.10.120
Hardware revision: 0x00000003 (3)
Driver version : 5.10.120
Interface Info:
ID : 0x0300000b
Type : V4L Video
Entity Info:
ID : 0x00000009 (9)
Name : vi-output, veyecam 10-003b
Function : V4L2 I/O
Pad 0x0100000a : 0: Sink
Link 0x0200000f: from remote pad 0x1000006 of entity '13e40000.host1x:nvcsi@15a00000-': Data, Enabled
Priority: 2
Video input : 0 (Camera 2: no power)
Format Video Capture:
Width/Height : 1920/1080
Pixel Format : 'UYVY' (UYVY 4:2:2)
Field : None
Bytes per Line : 3840
Size Image : 4147200
Colorspace : sRGB
Transfer Function : Default (maps to sRGB)
YCbCr/HSV Encoding: Default (maps to ITU-R 601)
Quantization : Default (maps to Limited Range)
Flags :Camera Controls
sensor_mode 0x009a2008 (int64) : min=0 max=1 step=1 default=0 value=0 flags=slider sensor_configuration 0x009a2032 (u32) : min=0 max=4294967295 step=1 default=0 [22] flags=read-only, volatile, has-payload sensor_mode_i2c_packet 0x009a2033 (u32) : min=0 max=4294967295 step=1 default=0 [1026] flags=read-only, volatile, has-payload sensor_control_i2c_packet 0x009a2034 (u32) : min=0 max=4294967295 step=1 default=0 [1026] flags=read-only, volatile, has-payload bypass_mode 0x009a2064 (intmenu): min=0 max=1 default=0 value=0 0: 0 (0x0) 1: 1 (0x1) override_enable 0x009a2065 (intmenu): min=0 max=1 default=0 value=0 0: 0 (0x0) 1: 1 (0x1) height_align 0x009a2066 (int) : min=1 max=16 step=1 default=1 value=1 size_align 0x009a2067 (intmenu): min=0 max=2 default=0 value=0 0: 1 (0x1) 1: 65536 (0x10000) 2: 131072 (0x20000) write_isp_format 0x009a2068 (int) : min=1 max=1 step=1 default=1 value=1 sensor_signal_properties 0x009a2069 (u32) : min=0 max=4294967295 step=1 default=0 [30][18] flags=read-only, has-payload sensor_image_properties 0x009a206a (u32) : min=0 max=4294967295 step=1 default=0 [30][16] flags=read-only, has-payload sensor_control_properties 0x009a206b (u32) : min=0 max=4294967295 step=1 default=0 [30][36] flags=read-only, has-payload sensor_dv_timings 0x009a206c (u32) : min=0 max=4294967295 step=1 default=0 [30][16] flags=read-only, has-payload low_latency_mode 0x009a206d (bool) : default=0 value=0 preferred_stride 0x009a206e (int) : min=0 max=65535 step=1 default=0 value=0 sensor_modes 0x009a2082 (int) : min=0 max=30 step=1 default=30 value=1 flags=read-only
-
VEYE-imx462 and Orin Nano developer kit problem
Hello everyone,
I'm attempting to use the VEYE-imx462 camera in conjunction with the Jetson Orin Nano 8GB original developer kit. I've followed the instructions outlined in this guide:
https://wiki.veye.cc/index.php/VEYE_CS_Camera_for_Jetson_TX2Unfortunately, I'm encountering issues, and when I run "dmesg | grep veye," I receive the following output:
[16.290295] veye_mvcam: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
[16.290511] veye_mvcam: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
[16.297416] veye_mvcam: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
[16.313909] mvcam 9-003b: veye mv series camera driver version: 01.01.03
[16.815979] veye_mvcam: mvcam_read: Reading register 0x04 failed
[16.832733] mvcam 10-003b: veye mv series camera driver version: 01.01.03Does anyone have a solution for this issue?
Thank you in advance.