Navigation

    VEYE IMAGING Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • WIKI
    • veye.cc

    SOLVED MV-MIPI-GMAX4002M compatibility with Jetson Xavier NX, Orin NX

    Machine Vision camera
    3
    12
    1724
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      newstec @veye_xumm last edited by

      @veye_xumm

      I purchased the MV-MIPI-GMAX4002M with the ADP-MV1-V2 adapter. I installed the Jetpack6.2,L4T r36.4.3 on the Jetson Orin NX 8gb. However, unfortunately I cannot install it using the GitHub repository "nvidia_jetson_veye_bsp". How can I proceed with the installation? Thank you very much!

      veye_xumm 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • veye_xumm
        veye_xumm @newstec last edited by

        @newstec
        https://wiki.veye.cc/index.php/How_to_upgrade_the_Jetson_system_to_support_VEYE_cameras
        Please refer to this article, mainly part 6.6, part 6.8, and part 8.

        N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          newstec @veye_xumm last edited by

          @veye_xumm

          Thank you very much for the reply, it really helped! I followed the recommendations faithfully and successfully completed the installation. However, I'm facing a problem:

          The camera generates an image with errors and very low fps, as shown in the attached image:
          2.jpg

          Attached is the sudo dmesg: ubuntu@ubuntu~$ sudo dmesg.txt

          ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo dmesg | grep -i 'fail'
          [  779.319935] mvcam 10-003b: camera_common_s_power: failed to enable mclk
          [ 2254.006074] NVRM rpcRmApiControl_dce: NVRM_RPC_DCE: Failed RM ctrl call cmd:0x731341 result 0xffff:
          [ 2334.553992] mvcam 10-003b: camera_common_s_power: failed to enable mclk
          [ 3210.855067] NVRM rpcRmApiControl_dce: NVRM_RPC_DCE: Failed RM ctrl call cmd:0x731341 result 0xffff:
          ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo i2cdetect -y -r 9
               0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f
          00:                         -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          10: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          20: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          30: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          40: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          50: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          60: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          70: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --                         
          ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo i2cdetect -y -r 10
               0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f
          00:                         -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          10: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          20: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          30: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- UU -- -- -- -- 
          40: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          50: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          60: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
          70: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --                         
          ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ ls /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/bus@0/cam_i2cmux/i2c@0/
          '#address-cells'   rbpcv2_imx219_a@10   reg            status
           name              rbpcv3_mvcam_a@3b   '#size-cells'
          ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ ls /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/
          at24                fusb301     nxp-pca9450         sec_pmic
          axp20x-i2c          ina3221     pca953x             simple-mfd-i2c
          bd9571mwv           max732x     pca954x             smbus_alert
          bq27xxx-battery     max77620    pf8x00              tpm_i2c_infineon
          cros-ec-i2c         max8973     pfuze100-regulator  ucsi_ccg
          cs2000-cp           mp8859      rk808               usb3503
          dummy               mvcam       rohm-bd718x7        vc5
          fan53555-regulator  nvvrs_pseq  rtc-ds3232
          ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ v4l2-ctl --list-formats-ext
          ioctl: VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT
          	Type: Video Capture
          
          	[0]: 'GREY' (8-bit Greyscale)
          		Size: Discrete 2048x1200
          			Interval: Discrete 0.037s (27.000 fps)
          	[1]: 'XY10' (XAVIER 10-bit/16-bit Greyscale)
          		Size: Discrete 2048x1200
          			Interval: Discrete 0.037s (27.000 fps)
          	[2]: 'XY12' (XAVIER 12-bit/16-bit Greyscale)
          		Size: Discrete 2048x1200
          			Interval: Discrete 0.037s (27.000 fps)
          ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Downloads/nvidia_jetson_veye_bsp/mv_tools_jetson/i2c_tools$ sudo ./mv_mipi_i2c.sh -r -f version -b 10
          [sudo] password for ubuntu: 
          Executing: ./mv_mipi_i2c_new.sh -r version -b 10
          version is C 01.48 and L 03.20
          
          
          TIMEOUT 30
          DEFAULT primary
          
          MENU TITLE L4T boot options
          
          LABEL primary
                MENU LABEL primary kernel
                LINUX /boot/Image
                INITRD /boot/initrd
                APPEND ${cbootargs} root=PARTUUID=e7cecac7-8b18-4414-b9b9-41ae8eab84d9 rw rootwait rootfstype=ext4 mminit_loglevel=4 console=ttyTCU0,115200 firmware_class.path=/etc/firmware fbcon=map:0 nospectre_bhb video=efifb:off console=tty0 nv-auto-config 
                FDT /boot/dtb/kernel_tegra234-p3768-0000+p3767-0001-nv.dtb
                OVERLAYS /boot/veyecam/tegra234-p3767-camera-p3768-veye_mvcam-dual-4lane-cam1.dtbo
          
          # When testing a custom kernel, it is recommended that you create a backup of
          # the original kernel and add a new entry to this file so that the device can
          # fallback to the original kernel. To do this:
          #
          # 1, Make a backup of the original kernel
          #      sudo cp /boot/Image /boot/Image.backup
          #
          # 2, Copy your custom kernel into /boot/Image
          #
          # 3, Uncomment below menu setting lines for the original kernel
          #
          # 4, Reboot
          
          # LABEL backup
          #    MENU LABEL backup kernel
          #    LINUX /boot/Image.backup
          #    INITRD /boot/initrd
          #    APPEND ${cbootargs}
          
          

          I only have one camera.

          I'd be very happy if it worked well! Thank you very much.

          veye_xumm 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • veye_xumm
            veye_xumm @newstec last edited by

            @newstec
            Please try veye_viewer.
            https://github.com/veyeimaging/veye_viewer/releases/tag/v0.1.1_jetson

            N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              newstec @veye_xumm last edited by

              @veye_xumm
              99.png

              Thanks for all the help!

              N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                newstec @newstec last edited by

                @veye_xumm Good news, it's working!

                I changed the port to "CAM1" (i2c-9).

                I believe the "v0.1.1_jetson" files were essential for proper operation.

                Thank you for your efforts in helping.

                44.jpg

                veye_xumm 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • veye_xumm
                  veye_xumm @newstec last edited by

                  @newstec Cheers!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    STiwana last edited by

                    Hi @veye_xumm
                    I have an application that needs a very low latency (<10ms at maximum. Even less if possible) from capture to being available to the Jetson for real-tim processing. I read in some posts on the forum that veye cameras have more than 100ms latency due to ISP. In that case, is there any VEYE camera that I can still use? My requirements are:

                    • Bigger pixel size for low light capture (the GMAX4002 seemed decent)
                    • High frame rate (at least more than 60fps)
                    • Ability to use a physical trigger signal
                    • Very low latency (<10ms, even less if possible).

                    Please guide me if there are any VEYE cameras which will satisfy my requirements. Thank you.

                    veye_xumm 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • veye_xumm
                      veye_xumm @STiwana last edited by

                      @stiwana
                      I think the post on the forum might have misled you. In fact, the latency of the VEYE series (models starting with VEYE-) is relatively high.
                      The latency of the MV series, for instance MV-MIPI-GAMX4002M, is very low (below 1ms) because our ISP pipeline does not use frame buffering and only has a small amount of line buffering.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        STiwana @veye_xumm last edited by

                        @veye_xumm
                        Thanks so much for your answer. I am very glad I asked you this question. Of the latency is 1ms as you mention , then the rest looks suitable too. I will buy some to test.

                        Some follow up question:

                        1. With the MV-MIPI-GMAX4002 camera on Jetson, can I also use the camera inside a gstreamer pipeline (and also maintain the low latency)?
                        2. For the lowest latency and deterministic performance (the application will need to know exactly when the frame was acquired), what would you suggest with these cameras...use from opencv or gstreamer, or does it not matter? Any other tips you can give me for very low latency, real time performance with the MV cameras?
                        3. What's the usual lead time to buy these cameras in case the cameras are out of stock when purchasing (from a supply chain point of view when my device is in production)
                        4. How many years do you plan to keep these camera modules available for?

                        Best Regards

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post